Unclear scope and obligations
Teams struggle to determine which products fall under CRA, what "essential cybersecurity requirements" mean in practice, and how to classify product risk.
Teams struggle to determine which products fall under CRA, what "essential cybersecurity requirements" mean in practice, and how to classify product risk.
Vulnerability handling, SBOM generation, incident reporting, and secure development lifecycle processes are either absent or undocumented.
Enforcement begins in 2027. Without a structured approach, teams risk last-minute scrambles that compromise both quality and market access.
Identify which products fall under CRA. Classify risk categories. Map existing processes against CRA Annex I requirements.
1–4 weeksEvaluate your current security posture: vulnerability handling, SBOM readiness, incident response, and secure development lifecycle maturity.
3–5 weeksPrioritized action plan with owners, dependencies, and milestones. Aligned to your release cycles and organizational capacity.
1–2 weeksHands-on guidance building processes, documentation, and technical controls. SBOM tooling, vulnerability disclosure, secure-by-design practices.
4–12 weeksFinal review of documentation, technical evidence, and conformity assessment preparation. Your team is equipped to maintain compliance independently.
1–2 weeksPractical experience with UNECE R155/R156, ISO/SAE 21434, and IEC 62443. I understand how CRA connects to existing automotive and IoT security frameworks.
Not just policy documents. I work with your engineering teams to implement controls that actually work in real development and CI/CD pipelines.
Every engagement produces actionable output: gap reports, process templates, and evidence packages — not slide decks.
Book a free 30-minute scoping call. I'll help you understand where you stand and what it takes to get compliant before enforcement begins.